Friday, March 2, 2012

Gaslighting


Gaslighting



 I came across this article a few months ago and had forgotten about it until a few days ago when I noticed the effects of gaslighting on myself.

Gaslighting is essentially when someone reacts to your emotions by telling you that you are being irrational. All those times people tell you to “calm down”, “relax” or say that you are acting “crazy” after they have done something to piss you off: yeah, that’s gaslighting.

Gaslighting causes people or, as this article contends, specifically women, to try to hide their emotions to assure they are not perceived as irrational. i.e. when you send someone what is supposed to be an angry text for being 30 minutes late, you might say “you’re late :)”, throwing in that smiley face to make sure you simultaneously voice your annoyance but don’t come off as bitchy for expecting your date to understand that 7:00 is not 7:45.

There is clearly a stigma that comes with being a woman. A stigma that says that women are emotional, bitchy, needy, nagging, erratic, and irrational. Gaslighting is a way to play off of this stigma.

 Our society teaches women that we are predisposed to all of these tendencies by nature. It’s all in our DNA. But, nevertheless, these are all bad, and we must work constantly not to fall into this pit that nature has dug for us. So when men say that we are being emotional, bitchy, or erratic they are probably right. We are probably just succumbing to our nature and we need that nice little nudge to help us back out of our pit. (read in a terribly patronizing voice)

That is exactly why gaslighting is so effective. It uses our fear, subconscious or conscious, of becoming the nagging woman against us. And it inevitably leads to subordination. Because it reinforces that idea the women are predisposed to these tendencies and because it makes these tendencies seem disadvantageous, women are subsequently perceived as less valuable than men. 


How is it that we can combat this? How can we change not only our perception but the perceptions of others?

As a parting gift: Meredith Books!

2 comments:

  1. I feel like in situations like this, people automatically assume that someone will end up on the offensive side being told their emotions, even if valid, are irrational. When this is the case, things usually get heated, and things get spoken in a manner, due to the tension of the situation, in a way that comes off as pugnacious and combative (from both parties). While I do not see a way for women in particular to have a strategy to avoid this, i feel like the easiest way for both males and females in these situations is to not jump on the defensive right away, and try your best to use tones of voice and listen to the other person instead of instinctually coming off as an asshole or a bitch

    ReplyDelete
  2. This makes me think of the stereotype of the angry feminist, yelling about patriarchy and burning bras. The word has become associated with anger to such an extent that a lot of my friends in high school, who were making statements about the right to reproductive healthcare, equal pay, etc, would start their arguments with "I'm not a feminist or anything, but..." It's the fear of being seen as angry or emotional, some weird mix of too womanly and unwomanly at the same time, that has made feminist a dirty word. It's so frustrating because, as you're saying, there's no way to win. We can't forcefully express our opinion, but when we add the smiley face, we dilute it for others, reinforcing their power (says the angry feminist). Anyway, I really liked your post and it's a feeling/experience that I didn't know had a name. :)

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.